-
Simon, Wolfram authored
> No NA's > Only the **ratio of harvested area** for disaggregation. Like this, there is more consistency with the presence of nuts/veggies in adm1 zones. Otherwise, it happened that there is area but no production vice versa. Then you divide by 0 = inf. > No inf values: The inf values came from the division of P/H=Y calculation. The P was in all cases very low so I decided to simply recode them to 0. Then Yields would be also 0. > rounding fixed > 1 decimal like in the original dataset so we do not lose the level of detail. > Yield conversion (production in mt) checked and correct. > Aggregation to adm1 checked and correct.
Simon, Wolfram authored> No NA's > Only the **ratio of harvested area** for disaggregation. Like this, there is more consistency with the presence of nuts/veggies in adm1 zones. Otherwise, it happened that there is area but no production vice versa. Then you divide by 0 = inf. > No inf values: The inf values came from the division of P/H=Y calculation. The P was in all cases very low so I decided to simply recode them to 0. Then Yields would be also 0. > rounding fixed > 1 decimal like in the original dataset so we do not lose the level of detail. > Yield conversion (production in mt) checked and correct. > Aggregation to adm1 checked and correct.